Research Article

GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and chemotherapy response in locally advanced breast cancer

Published: June 11, 2010
Genet. Mol. Res. 9 (2) : 1045-1053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4238/vol9-2gmr726
Cite this Article:
A.L. Oliveira, F.F.O. Rodrigues, R.E. Santos, T. Aoki, M.N. Rocha, C.A. Longui, M.B. Melo (2010). GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and chemotherapy response in locally advanced breast cancer. Genet. Mol. Res. 9(2): 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol9-2gmr726
3,450 views

Abstract

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) family consists of phase II detoxification enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of toxic substances, such as chemotherapeutic agents, to glutathione. We examined whether GSTT1/GSTT1“null”, GSTM1/GSTM1“null” and GSTP1Ile105Ile/GSTP1Ile105Val polymorphisms are associated with different response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage II and III breast cancer. Forty Brazilian women with invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, using 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, were genotyped for the GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genes. Clinical response was assessed by RECIST criteria. Comparisons were made for the three genes alone and in pairs, as polymorphic and as wild-type combinations and polymorphic/wild-type combinations. We analyzed all possible combinations and their response rate. Patients with the GSTT1/GSTP1105Ile combination were found to have a significantly better response than GSTT1“null”/GSTP1105Val (P = 0.0209) and GSTT1/GSTM1 (P = 0.0376) combinations. Analysis of all possible combinations showed the GSTM1“null” polymorphic genotype to be present in four, and the wild-type GSTP1105Ile in six of the combinations associated with the largest number of responding patients. We found that patients with the GSTT1/GSTP1105Ile wild-type combination had a significantly higher response rate to chemotherapy than patients with the respective polymorphic GSTT1“null”/GSTP1105Val combination or patients with the wild-type GSTT1/GSTM1. The six gene combinations associated with the largest number of responding patients were found to contain the wild-type GSTP1105Ile and the polymorphic-type GSTM1“null”. These specific combinations were virtually absent in the combinations with few responding patients.

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) family consists of phase II detoxification enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of toxic substances, such as chemotherapeutic agents, to glutathione. We examined whether GSTT1/GSTT1“null”, GSTM1/GSTM1“null” and GSTP1Ile105Ile/GSTP1Ile105Val polymorphisms are associated with different response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage II and III breast cancer. Forty Brazilian women with invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, using 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, were genotyped for the GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genes. Clinical response was assessed by RECIST criteria. Comparisons were made for the three genes alone and in pairs, as polymorphic and as wild-type combinations and polymorphic/wild-type combinations. We analyzed all possible combinations and their response rate. Patients with the GSTT1/GSTP1105Ile combination were found to have a significantly better response than GSTT1“null”/GSTP1105Val (P = 0.0209) and GSTT1/GSTM1 (P = 0.0376) combinations. Analysis of all possible combinations showed the GSTM1“null” polymorphic genotype to be present in four, and the wild-type GSTP1105Ile in six of the combinations associated with the largest number of responding patients. We found that patients with the GSTT1/GSTP1105Ile wild-type combination had a significantly higher response rate to chemotherapy than patients with the respective polymorphic GSTT1“null”/GSTP1105Val combination or patients with the wild-type GSTT1/GSTM1. The six gene combinations associated with the largest number of responding patients were found to contain the wild-type GSTP1105Ile and the polymorphic-type GSTM1“null”. These specific combinations were virtually absent in the combinations with few responding patients.