Publications

Found 1 results
Filters: Author is M. Erdemoğlu  [Clear All Filters]
2010
M. Balkan, İsi, H., İsi, H., Gedik, A., Erdemoğlu, M., and Budak, T., A small supernumerary marker chromosome, derived from chromosome 22, possibly associated with repeated spontaneous abortions, vol. 9. pp. 1683-1689, 2010.
Bloom SE and Goodpasture C (1976). An improved technique for selective silver staining of nucleolar organizer regions in human chromosomes. Hum. Genet. 34: 199-206.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00278889PMid:63440 Blumberg BD, Shulkin JD, Rotter JI, Mohandas T, et al. (1982). Minor chromosomal variants and major chromosomal anomalies in couples with recurrent abortion. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 34: 948-960.PMid:7180849 PMCid:1685697 Chandley AC, Edmond P, Christie S, Gowans L, et al. (1975). Cytogenetics and infertility in man. I. Karyotype and seminal analysis: results of a five-year survey of men attending a subfertility clinic. Ann. Hum. Genet. 39: 231-254.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00126.xPMid:1052767 Crolla JA (1998). FISH and molecular studies of autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes excluding those derived from chromosome 15: II. Review of the literature. Am. J. Med. Genet. 75: 367-381.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19980203)75:4<367::AID-AJMG5>3.0.CO;2-N Crolla JA, Youings SA, Ennis S and Jacobs PA (2005). Supernumerary marker chromosomes in man: parental origin, mosaicism and maternal age revisited. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13: 154-160.http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201311PMid:15508017 Dalprà L, Giardino D, Finelli P, Corti C, et al. (2005). Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes: cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories. Genet. Med. 7: 620-625.http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.gim.0000182876.57766.2dPMid:16301863 Diego-Alvarez D, Ramos-Corrales C, Garcia-Hoyos M, Bustamante-Aragones A, et al. (2006). Double trisomy in spontaneous miscarriages: cytogenetic and molecular approach. Hum. Reprod. 21: 958-966.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei406PMid:16361293 Djalali M (1990). The significance of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Ann. Genet. 33: 141-145.PMid:2288457 Graf MD, Christ L, Mascarello JT, Mowrey P, et al. (2006). Redefining the risks of prenatally ascertained supernumerary marker chromosomes: a collaborative study. J. Med. Genet. 43: 660-664.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2005.037887PMid:16882740 PMCid:2564588 International Software Consulting Network (ISCN) (1995). An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. In: Recommendations of the International Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (Mitelman F, ed.). S. Karger Publishers Inc., Basel. Kumar C, Svetlana MK, Rhea VS and Ram SV (1997). Marker chromosomes in fetal loss. Hum. Reprod. 12: 1321-1324.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.6.1321PMid:9222025 Liehr T (2006). Familial small supernumerary marker chromosomes are predominantly inherited via the maternal line. Genet. Med. 8: 459-462.http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200607000-00011PMid:16845280 Liehr T, Claussen U and Starke H (2004). Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in humans. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107: 55-67.http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000079572PMid:15305057 Manvelyan M, Riegel M, Santos M, Fuster C, et al. (2008). Thirty-two new cases with small supernumerary marker chromosomes detected in connection with fertility problems: detailed molecular cytogenetic characterization and review of the literature. Int. J. Mol. Med. 21: 705-714.PMid:18506363 Mau UA, Backert IT, Kaiser P and Kiesel L (1997). Chromosomal findings in 150 couples referred for genetic counselling prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod. 12: 930-937.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.5.930PMid:9194642 Mulcahy MT and Jenkyn J (1972). Results of 538 chromosome studies on patients referred for cytogenetic analysis. Med. J. Aust. 2: 1333-1338.PMid:4265391 Paoloni-Giacobino A, Morris MA and Dahoun SP (1998). Prenatal supernumerary r(16) chromosome characterized by multiprobe FISH with normal pregnancy outcome. Prenat. Diagn. 18: 751-752.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199807)18:7<751::AID-PD312>3.0.CO;2-5 Ridler MA, Berg JM, Pendrey MJ, Salda-a P, et al. (1970). Familial occurrence of a small, supernumerary metacentric chromosome in phenotypically normal women. J. Med. Genet. 7: 148-152.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg.7.2.148PMid:5519601 PMCid:1468799 Seabright M (1971). A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2: 971-972.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(71)90287-X Warburton D (1984). Outcome of de novo structural rearrangements diagnosed translocation heterozygotes at amniocentesis as determined by potential at amniocentesis. Prenat. Diagn. 4 (Special Issue): 69-80.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.1970040706PMid:6463034 Warburton D (1991). De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49: 995-1013.PMid:1928105 PMCid:1683246